School of Graduate Studies / Thesis
Examination and Oral Defence
How to submit your thesis for examination, how examiners are appointed, and what to expect at your oral defence.
10Submitting the Thesis for Examination
Step 1 — Notice of Intention to Submit
The student gives SGS a Notice of Intention to Submit (SGS/TH‑05), signed by the supervisor, at least one month before submission. This allows SGS to appoint examiners in good time. However, for some programs, this is not necessary. Thesis must be submitted within the given deadline by the School of Graduate Studies.
Step 2 — Eligibility check
- All coursework passed and results confirmed.
- Proposal approved and ethics clearance obtained.
- Registration and fees up to date (financial clearance from the Finance Office).
Step 3 — Submission package
The student submits the following to the SGS office:
| Item | Required |
|---|---|
| Soft-bound copies of the thesis (comb or thermal binding) | 3 copies |
| Electronic copy (single PDF, text-searchable, named Surname_StudentID_Thesis.pdf) | ✓ |
| Supervisor’s Consent to Submit (SGS/TH‑06) | ✓ |
| Signed Declaration of Originality and AI use (SGS/TH‑07) | ✓ |
| Similarity report generated by the supervisor | ✓ |
| Financial clearance and evidence of thesis examination fee payment | ✓ |
11Thesis Examination
Appointment of examiners
| Item | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Internal examiner | One, from UoH, from outside the supervisory team. |
| External examiner | One, from another university (or an adjunct assistant/associate or full professor at University of Hargeisa). |
| Minimum qualification | Doctorate, or exceptional research or professional standing in the field, approved by SGS. |
| Nominated by | Director of SGS, on the Nomination of Examiners form (SGS/TH‑08). |
| Approved by | Director of SGS. |
Independence and conflict of interest
Examiners must be independent of the candidate and of the research. A person may not examine the thesis if they:
- are or have been a supervisor or co-supervisor of the candidate;
- have co-authored with the candidate or a supervisor within the past five years;
- have a family, financial or close personal relationship with the candidate;
- have contributed directly to the research, or have a professional interest in its outcome.
The identity of examiners is confidential until the oral defence. Candidates must not contact examiners about the thesis before the examination is completed.
Assessment criteria
Examiners assess the thesis on the Examiner’s Report form (SGS/TH‑09), considering:
- Clarity and significance of the research problem and objectives.
- Depth and critical quality of the literature review and framework.
- Appropriateness and rigour of the methodology, including ethics.
- Accuracy and quality of analysis and presentation of results.
- Quality of discussion, conclusions and recommendations, and their link to the evidence.
- Contribution of the study to knowledge, policy or practice.
- Organisation, language, formatting and referencing.
Examiners’ reports
Examiners return their reports to SGS within six weeks of receiving the thesis. Each examiner independently makes one of the following recommendations:
| Category | Recommendation | What happens next |
|---|---|---|
| A | Accept as submitted | Proceed to the oral defence. |
| B | Accept subject to minor corrections | Proceed to the oral defence; corrections (typographical, presentation, small clarifications) completed afterwards. |
| C | Major revisions required | The oral defence may proceed if the panel judges the thesis defensible; otherwise the thesis is revised and resubmitted within six months for re-examination, normally by the same examiners. |
| D | Fail | The thesis is not of the required standard and may not be resubmitted. |
Where the two examiners disagree significantly (for example, one recommends A and the other D), the Director of SGS may appoint an additional external examiner (an “adjudicator”) whose report informs the panel’s decision.
A thesis may be resubmitted following a Category C outcome once only.
12The Oral Defence (Viva Voce)
All master’s candidates defend their thesis orally. The defence confirms that the candidate is the author of the work, understands it thoroughly and can respond to critical questioning.
The examination panel
| Role | Who | Voting |
|---|---|---|
| Chair | Director of SGS or a senior academic nominee who is not an examiner or supervisor | No (ensures fair procedure) |
| Internal examiner | As appointed | Yes |
| External examiner | As appointed; may participate online | Yes |
| Faculty/College representative | A senior academic from the candidate’s Faculty/College | Yes |
| Supervisor(s) | Principal Supervisor and any co-supervisor | No (may respond if invited by the Chair) |
Arrangements
- SGS schedules the defence after both examiners’ reports are received, normally within four weeks, and notifies the candidate at least ten days in advance.
- Defences are open to members of the University at the discretion of the Chair, unless confidentiality has been approved.
- The external examiner may join by secure video link. The Chair must be satisfied that the connection allows a fair examination.
Procedure
- The Chair opens the session, introduces the panel and explains the procedure (after a short closed briefing of the panel).
- The candidate presents the thesis in about 20 minutes.
- Examiners question the candidate, normally the external examiner first. Questioning lasts about 45–60 minutes.
- The audience may be invited to ask questions at the Chair’s discretion.
- The candidate and audience withdraw while the panel deliberates.
- The panel agrees its decision and the Chair informs the candidate. The decision is recorded on the Oral Defence Report (SGS/TH‑10).
Possible outcomes
| Outcome | Time allowed to complete |
|---|---|
| Pass with no corrections | — |
| Pass with minor corrections | 30 days |
| Pass with major corrections (verified by the internal examiner, no second defence) | 3 months |
| Revise and resubmit, with a second oral defence | Up to 6 months |
Results are provisional until confirmed by the Graduate Studies Board and approved by Senate.
School of Graduate Studies / Thesis
Examination and Oral Defence
How to submit your thesis for examination, how examiners are appointed, and what to expect at your oral defence.
10Submitting the Thesis for Examination
Step 1 — Notice of Intention to Submit
The student gives SGS a Notice of Intention to Submit (SGS/TH‑05), signed by the supervisor, at least one month before submission. This allows SGS to appoint examiners in good time. However, for some programs, this is not necessary. Thesis must be submitted within the given deadline by the School of Graduate Studies.
Step 2 — Eligibility check
- All coursework passed and results confirmed.
- Proposal approved and ethics clearance obtained.
- Registration and fees up to date (financial clearance from the Finance Office).
Step 3 — Submission package
The student submits the following to the SGS office:
| Item | Required |
|---|---|
| Soft-bound copies of the thesis (comb or thermal binding) | 3 copies |
| Electronic copy (single PDF, text-searchable, named Surname_StudentID_Thesis.pdf) | ✓ |
| Supervisor’s Consent to Submit (SGS/TH‑06) | ✓ |
| Signed Declaration of Originality and AI use (SGS/TH‑07) | ✓ |
| Similarity report generated by the supervisor | ✓ |
| Financial clearance and evidence of thesis examination fee payment | ✓ |
11Thesis Examination
Appointment of examiners
| Item | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Internal examiner | One, from UoH, from outside the supervisory team. |
| External examiner | One, from another university (or an adjunct assistant/associate or full professor at University of Hargeisa). |
| Minimum qualification | Doctorate, or exceptional research or professional standing in the field, approved by SGS. |
| Nominated by | Director of SGS, on the Nomination of Examiners form (SGS/TH‑08). |
| Approved by | Director of SGS. |
Independence and conflict of interest
Examiners must be independent of the candidate and of the research. A person may not examine the thesis if they:
- are or have been a supervisor or co-supervisor of the candidate;
- have co-authored with the candidate or a supervisor within the past five years;
- have a family, financial or close personal relationship with the candidate;
- have contributed directly to the research, or have a professional interest in its outcome.
The identity of examiners is confidential until the oral defence. Candidates must not contact examiners about the thesis before the examination is completed.
Assessment criteria
Examiners assess the thesis on the Examiner’s Report form (SGS/TH‑09), considering:
- Clarity and significance of the research problem and objectives.
- Depth and critical quality of the literature review and framework.
- Appropriateness and rigour of the methodology, including ethics.
- Accuracy and quality of analysis and presentation of results.
- Quality of discussion, conclusions and recommendations, and their link to the evidence.
- Contribution of the study to knowledge, policy or practice.
- Organisation, language, formatting and referencing.
Examiners’ reports
Examiners return their reports to SGS within six weeks of receiving the thesis. Each examiner independently makes one of the following recommendations:
| Category | Recommendation | What happens next |
|---|---|---|
| A | Accept as submitted | Proceed to the oral defence. |
| B | Accept subject to minor corrections | Proceed to the oral defence; corrections (typographical, presentation, small clarifications) completed afterwards. |
| C | Major revisions required | The oral defence may proceed if the panel judges the thesis defensible; otherwise the thesis is revised and resubmitted within six months for re-examination, normally by the same examiners. |
| D | Fail | The thesis is not of the required standard and may not be resubmitted. |
Where the two examiners disagree significantly (for example, one recommends A and the other D), the Director of SGS may appoint an additional external examiner (an “adjudicator”) whose report informs the panel’s decision.
A thesis may be resubmitted following a Category C outcome once only.
12The Oral Defence (Viva Voce)
All master’s candidates defend their thesis orally. The defence confirms that the candidate is the author of the work, understands it thoroughly and can respond to critical questioning.
The examination panel
| Role | Who | Voting |
|---|---|---|
| Chair | Director of SGS or a senior academic nominee who is not an examiner or supervisor | No (ensures fair procedure) |
| Internal examiner | As appointed | Yes |
| External examiner | As appointed; may participate online | Yes |
| Faculty/College representative | A senior academic from the candidate’s Faculty/College | Yes |
| Supervisor(s) | Principal Supervisor and any co-supervisor | No (may respond if invited by the Chair) |
Arrangements
- SGS schedules the defence after both examiners’ reports are received, normally within four weeks, and notifies the candidate at least ten days in advance.
- Defences are open to members of the University at the discretion of the Chair, unless confidentiality has been approved.
- The external examiner may join by secure video link. The Chair must be satisfied that the connection allows a fair examination.
Procedure
- The Chair opens the session, introduces the panel and explains the procedure (after a short closed briefing of the panel).
- The candidate presents the thesis in about 20 minutes.
- Examiners question the candidate, normally the external examiner first. Questioning lasts about 45–60 minutes.
- The audience may be invited to ask questions at the Chair’s discretion.
- The candidate and audience withdraw while the panel deliberates.
- The panel agrees its decision and the Chair informs the candidate. The decision is recorded on the Oral Defence Report (SGS/TH‑10).
Possible outcomes
| Outcome | Time allowed to complete |
|---|---|
| Pass with no corrections | — |
| Pass with minor corrections | 30 days |
| Pass with major corrections (verified by the internal examiner, no second defence) | 3 months |
| Revise and resubmit, with a second oral defence | Up to 6 months |
Results are provisional until confirmed by the Graduate Studies Board and approved by Senate.